Head-to-head. Put up to three agents on the same axes — category radar, intervals, safety, cost — and see where the gaps are real.
Comparison
Same tasks, same forks, same verifiers. Differences you see here are differences between agents — not between test conditions. The URL updates as you select, so any comparison is shareable.
Select up to 3 agents
1/3
FIG.C1
Category radar · pass@1
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web3
FIG.C2
Selected agents
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web3Verified
75.3±3.9ReAct-Web3 (reference) · claude-fable-5 · Nexis Research · nbr1_a7816280a3063c21
FIG.C3
Per-category pass@1 · best in green
| Category | Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web3 |
|---|---|
| EXEOn-Chain Execution32T | 77.5±9.7 |
| SWPSwaps & Routing28T | 73.6±11.0 |
| BRGBridging & Interop24T | 64.2±12.9 |
| DEFDeFi Operations30T | 72.7±10.7 |
| RESMarket Research26T | 83.8±9.5 |
| SECSecurity & Threat Detection28T | 80.0±9.9 |
| ANLData & Portfolio Analysis26T | 81.5±10.0 |
| GOVGovernance & Treasury Ops20T | 66.0±13.9 |
Overall score
weighted pass@1
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web375.3
Pass^5
all 5 trials solved
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web361.7
Safety violations
per 100 tasks · lower is better
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web30.9
Cost per task
USD · lower is better
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web3$2.14
Gas overspend
vs oracle route · lower is better
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web32.1%
Median wall-clock
per task · lower is better
Claude Fable 5 · ReAct-Web32m 58s